0000016379 00000 n DEBATE GRADING RUBRIC On the right side of the rubric, please write the number representing what you think was the performance level of the VP candidate in question for each criterion below. Ask questions to clarify arguments. Cross-ex, short for cross-examination, is a period of time between speeches where opponents ask each other questions to clarify and better understand each other's case (and, if all goes well, an important concession for you to win the debate). Logical reasons and/or examples and factual evidence are given to support reasons or arguments. ���� �mGe/G� ���� . Judge Ballot - Numbered Packet (1-24) for Seating Charts. 0000102220 00000 n While you are observing participants, make lots of notes. Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess. Level of Preparation (having well-prepared, original case, etc.) Students debate one-on-one for each question 5 minutes: Prep 90 seconds each: Opening Statements 1 minute each: Cross Examination 1 minute each: Closing Statements Debrief . &. 0000052035 00000 n Levels of Performance for AFFIRMATIVE Team Criteria 1. Judging Instructions The Ohio Speech & Debate Association. Answers given are direct. "*��?�����:����eIT����L��nc��F�S�&���46�`������ƒ�55��e[��i"�lwQ����w_���R��w]��U]��b'����iV�Õ5-\�z��܀ZB:L/Ш���gS2��T�������Ѵ������C���X�&t:��?�8o��V�4GN���Z[�K��g�U}�m^��r�;Z �x�-/S��~f�����H�%1 Rubric for Debate.docx - Levels of Performance for AFFIRMATIVE Team Criteria 1 Organization Clarity Main arguments and responses are outlined in a clear. Debate performance (see rubric below) will constitute 20% of the course grade. Extemp Cross Examination Guidelines (for distribution to judges) Debate Events - OSDA Judge Overview ... (OHSSL) Judging Rubric for Speakers and PO ** Single OHSSL Judge Ballot. Asking and Answering Questions in Cross-Examination . Debate Rubric.pdf: File Size: 53 kb: File Type: pdf: Download File. 0000047740 00000 n Very little cross-exam or rebuttals; failure to identify other group’s argumentative flaws . ______________, Quality of Case Arguments (including support with appropriate, evidence and/or expert opinion)                                              30 pts. ��ࡱ� > �� > @ ���� = �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� _� �� $ bjbj���� 4 ��>\��>\$ �� �� �� � 6 6 � � � � � ���� � � � � � , � {1 4 DEBATE RUBRIC: ‘To Drop the Bomb or Not to Drop the Bomb ... Cross-examination & Rebuttal Strategy. Clear Signposting (labeling by name and number). 0000013472 00000 n Then calculate the average for each. Above average cross-exam and rebuttal arguments, with few mistakes. ______________, Clear Signposting (labeling by name and number), of all arguments (your own & your opponent's)                          20 pts. 0000111891 00000 n 0000116622 00000 n Closing Argument Rubric: File Size: 146 kb: File Type: pdf: Download File. VP candidate in question for each criterion below. 0000074767 00000 n � 51 i i i � " � ��z�H5�EW|7�3`7�N~�Ř��+cA�fT��b�b�zD̞��t�A�D@����m^R]�ΰuM�p��C $�=��c_�_���M�{?\�Gk�Ȅ����(�3i�X�\��Q�8��|�b���5�{e�L�h�o�L�6 0000014126 00000 n Cross-Examination Team Debate These directions expand upon but do not replace the information in the UIL Constitution and Contest Rules. iRubric: Lincoln-Douglas Debate Judging Ballot rubric preview rubric find rubric : edit print share ... Their responses, while under cross examination, further expand the argument and focused on the resolution. iRubric: Oral participation in a debate rubric find rubric: edit print share Copy to my rubrics ... Rebuttal/Use of Cross Examination Questions asked relate to what was previously stated by opponent. 0000010792 00000 n 0000015540 00000 n Get Started. ______________, Quality of Cross-Examination Questions & Answers, (includes being firm but polite; at least some questions, should be prepared)                                                              20 pts. Team Collaboration. debate rubric for grading their own and/or peers' debate performances (provided) Lesson Plan This lesson presents several basic debate formats, including the popular Lincoln-Douglas format. 0000016636 00000 n Debate is a popular extracurricular activity that gives participants opportunities to refine their critical thinking and public speaking skills. %PDF-1.4 %���� 0000031043 00000 n OSDA Executive Director. � 0000001256 00000 n Viewpoints and responses are outlined both clearly and orderly. The contest director should read Sections 1000 and 1001 of the Constitution, then read these guidelines for additional details. �d�g�Ƙ´c���C\���X�C�-�7�&Xex�\���]����@cÙ���'�~[r�KZ����9C{�h�������$~�. 0000002187 00000 n 579 0 obj <> endobj xref 579 48 0000000016 00000 n Arguments made by the other side are responded to and dealt with effectively. Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy. 0000039676 00000 n ______________, Quality of Rebuttals with your opponent's arguments                20 pts. We have created a classroom edition of this textbook to use as a modified format for in-class debates as well as a full curriculum to teach various debate forms with assessments, rubrics, lesson plans, and activities. Writing Assignments Rubric.pdf: File Size: 51 kb: File Type: pdf: Download File. 0000113998 00000 n 0000102150 00000 n This preview shows page 1 - 2 out of 3 pages. 1AC _____ Presents the status quo and harms of present system _____(5) Uses and correctly labels evidence _____(5) Handles cross-examination questions well _____(5) trailer <]>> startxref 0 %%EOF 626 0 obj <>stream 0000001833 00000 n Copyright © 2002-2020 Blackboard, Inc. All rights reserved. Levels of Performance for AFFIRMATIVE Team, University of La Salette - Ramon, Isabela, University of Southern Maine • HISTORY 101, University of La Salette - Ramon, Isabela • COA 123, University of California, Irvine • PH 126 423123.